When they aren't, Turing posits, the question 'can machines think?' will have been answered in the affirmative. So, to perform the experiment, one must have some people play the game with humans a few times and then play with a human and a machine a few times, and look to see if the results are statistically significant. Our original, 'Can machines think?'") as "Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often when the game is played like this as he does when the game is played between a man and a woman?" And he just frames his question (which will "replace There's nothing in there about repetition, duration, or $10,000,000 prizes. I mean, you can read Turing's own definiton if his test - 'the Imitation Game' - on the first page of his 1950 paper Computing Machinery and Intelligence. ) is a solid example of a Turing test for magic. The "One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge" (.
You can take as long as you want, and if you're successful in breaking it under controlled conditions (IE, you don't cheat and use an out-of-band communication protocol with the 'bot'/human), we'll give you a 10,000,000$." "Anyone can play as judge any number of times. For something to pass a Turing test, it would need to be able to pass the following: But the point of the Turing test isn't to trick a person, it's to make it functionally impossible for a person to distinguish between the real and simulated thing, no matter how hard they try. Often I see headlines along the lines of "X fools people and beats the Turing test!". And even given that advantage, might have failed 2 as well? The judge cannot discern whether the 'bot' is real or a machine better than random chance. This judge is aware that they have to discern whether the 'bot' is real or a machine.Ģ.
Passing the Turing test requires, for any human judge:ġ.